From Static to Self Aware – 5D Shift

So some might think to ask, what is the mechanism by which we will interact with “5D” probability. It’s no folly to want to assume that some new mystical art of ‘creating’ will be required to subsume all prior practice of experiencing “physical/3D”, though it’s untrue. It is a given that the erstwhile “objective environment” construct is characterised, predominately by its sense of completeness such that one might feel, justifiably, it is necessary to go ‘outside’ of those parameters to obtain something new. It isn’t. Most of the readership know it isn’t. Thus we expand on that which you already know; there is a secret story overlaying the central narrative. A world hidden in a world. The world has characters, structures, continuity and commonalities. What we note, here, however, is that the intimation, it occupies a ‘distinct’ dimension, holds little bearing on its accessibility from the ‘dimension’ we are in. What is required, to that end, merely, is the psychological space for processing the information at its intrinsic rate.

Ultimately, this is, a practice, in no way different from the procedure undertaken by the function of ego to determine one’s “position” in a “concrete background world” so that is where we should start, individually, identifying what is our currency for this exchange. Where do we ‘hold alternates’ within the framework that gives us choice among locations? At any stage do you see yourself ‘holding’ more than one possible location for the same entity? When you do that you’re exploiting our means of far far more than simply deciding if Jack is Jill’s brother or just someone who looks like her, this agency advances the same apparatus one would use to navigate through a “5th Dimensional” landscape.

In 5D interaction the energy exchange (currency) shifts away from transposing ‘items of token’ – in 3d interaction, for example, one might look at a painting to appreciate it has beauty, in appreciation we transpose the item of token “beauty’ from concept to identity, this item belongs to a set, the elements of which interact with each other to form their own identity (beauty is to plain etc) – and toward opening parallel fields of cohesion within the drama. These parallel fields are also a set interacting via the same propensity to determine the identity of each other, that is to say, each element expands a limited number of identity spaces and once filled to coherence the whole element holds in contrast to one with the same identity spaces filled alternately. The fastest among us might, now, be wondering if we could have a probability space where the primary interaction was to exchange worlds like compliments. Well, why not? Sounds like fun, right? Actually, we do it every day so we’re really just talking scales of the material exchanged, for the most, in any point of difference.

So with this conception of the currency in exchange, in mind, consider the mechanism. The notion of this level of energy exchange, for items of token, is a one for one correspondence arrangement. This fits our conception of a self as singular among a field over spatial dimensions. Assortment of a discrete amount of available energy into discrete packets  characterises our interaction psychology with physical life in “3D”. This psychology is married to the concept of a discrete self among a field in spatial dimensions, it neglects time almost entirely, assigning it to a god of the gaps among its major flaws in being accurately referent to true reality. But by far, the flaw that sticks the camel through the eye of the needle is the “properness” imputed to filling this landscape as though it were, not even so humble as “true reality”, but moreover, necessary and absolute to all beyond it as well, but I have digressed. What is true about reality is that we are not possibly defined by a singular discrete object among a spatial field of things, ever. We might be a stream of images on a kaleidoscoping background of interlinked image streams,, or we might be blips of awareness, randomly intersecting information across an infinite plane of possibilities (see Boltzmann)… but we cannot be singular objects in a spatial field. There is nothing in observation that actually fits that description accurately, least of all us. We have observable self awareness, in our scale of time. We have spent a millenia or so wondering how a singular object is able to look at itself and still no answer…. probably because it can’t. We *can* because we are not singular (in time nor space). This fact, is our mechanism.

Because this post has been long, and awaited, I will expound with a fresh title on the details of our not being singular and just add a brief overview to this one. The fastest straight answer is to revisit the science of brain wave frequencies and how it is we are able to operate on two quite distinct frequencies in waking consciousness. There is a faster cycle of mental interaction and a slower one. The faster cycle is the one which we generally associate with our waking conscious activity. The slower one has all our more mystical seeming propensities attached to it – intuition, imagination, emotion and empathy etc – we don’t seem to know where these things come from, though with a long enough look at the situation it ought to become quite obvious. They’re more than one self, in time and space, working together.









The Age of Authenticity

The hand that moves you is either your own or it is the Divine hand.

For any thing to move it must accumulate an energy, known as kinetic energy. For example, on the fundamental level an electron absorbs the energy of a photon in order to, excited, step beyond the boundary of its prior range. What is key to us here is that the energy must be real. You can excite an electron by pointing a laser beam at it .the photons in the laser come from a source, a chemical heat reaction with authentic positional status referent to the real electron. One cannot “pretend” to fire a laser at an atom and expect the particles to excite according to the pretense. Likewise, one cannot infuse kinetic energy into any space of probability as pretense either. The hand that moves must be real.

This is the purpose of returning to authenticity, not just sincerity (though this counts somewhat) but pure unadulterated truth. Complete removal of all imposition on the bona fide integral being. We talk wildly about deconstructing “templates” and “worldviews”. In the past “convention” and “tradition” have worn the same tar. Essentially, these are all words for the same process which is to locate multiple states of identity in a ‘unitary’ expansion of probable states. All these unitary expansions are, basically, illusion and generation after generation we argue that very fact to the purpose of instituting a “new” one state for the whole. At some juncture in our ongoing back and forth about it, may we compel ourselves to recognise this error – there never was a “one state” defined by such principles*.

The unitary state of all is as described by the wave function.

Beyond this, the determination of union in a state is partial exclusively to the point of interaction, as it needs be.

So, two point locations interact in a region defined by their individual state (probabilistic) in relation directly and specifically to the form of interaction. To this end, it is perceptible, that a vestige of your identity, such as your flesh apparition, readily interacts with alternate universes, from where you stand. You may walk down the street once, to your conscious focus, and yet be observed doing so by occupants of different universes in their conscious focus. As long as all attend to the limit of congruent interaction, life goes on as normal for each and no rule is broken. Instead, new rules are defined because in the absence of the ‘concrete’ unified space provisioning an energetic “background” from which phenomenon may source, we need to define what belongs in its place.  Since I’m liberating the identity from the universe and need to describe what’s left for the identity its probably too evident that the identity itself is now forged with the function we previously accorded to universe. I’ll mention it anyhow.. What that amounts to is that the identity either operates from the energy of where it *is* (carried by actualised, real moments in the identity), or it doesn’t. When it does not the energy of the interaction does not parse through the entity; it cannot since it has no real form there, energy without form or substance in the entity defaults, then, to its substance in the remainder of all. This is the divine hand. To select a form outside your authentic location is to lend the energy (of your selection, through action and vocalisation) to the true source of that form.

Overall, this is not a “bad* thing and has a transformation to a function describing the echo of interaction through personal identity to the ‘onemind’ (unitary consciousness ie back to self), something we otherwise trifle with in the contemplation of Karma.

On this side, however, it can be recognised that your momentum through probability, like any momenta as a rule, needs a REAL source. If that source is not YOU in real terms it will be real in other terms and such motion is governed by the divine hand.









*We’re hardly skirting over this fact, not least given the consequence of rampant distrust among worldviews plaguing the here-now.


What is 5D?

So you’ve probably heard the herald of the great shift into 5D in 2018. I’m just gonna go right ahead and be the party pooper that says yeah but we’re just going to be learning it next year and we are going to find ourselves pretty sh**house at it at first. Like teenage, it’s gonna look a bit like we know it all, suddenly, but in reality we are going to be veritable noobs with the freedom and increased probability densities. In short we’ll be effective as underwater flyscreens in it, really, but it will be here just the same. That’s my word on the matter and you have my permission to quote or paraphrase as you desire.

So what exactly *is* 5d then?

I’m going to give an explanation, which I have, here, that formulates from the concept of frequencies in brainwave activity. There are levels that we have identified in the activity of our brain waves as we move through different states of our consciousness. Two of these detectable frequency levels exist in our conscious waking state, the others arise in meditative to dream states.
As we move through the levels of consciousness, from “waking” to “dream” and “unconscious”, the frequency of the brainwave pattern *decreases* and toward 5d we are moving in the direction from waking to unconscious. Yeah I know… “but we’re moving into higher frequency!” right? Ummm… ok, higher means better or some shizzz, isn’t that how it works? Sorry, not sorry, if I irritate you with this but that use of “higher” is a symbolic conception of “better” and always has been. The science says that faster repetition and reinforcement of information characterises the level of most physical interaction. If we argued over whether we’re going to “higher” or “lower” frequencies by that definition it’d be moot cause I’m not talking about the same thing, so let’s not. Deal?

Aiight… so the alpha (waking) state is a high frequency state and, as I implied above, this suggests a more repetitious reinforcement of the information in consciousness. If you really think about it, that’s what a solid state energy level has to look like, surely? I mean, if there was greater lag between the wall being there and not being there then we’d be more likely to walk through it, not less, follow? So it makes sense.
Just below this is the Beta state, it’s a slightly more offset (slower) level of reinforcement of “what is” entering consciousness. We call it the subconscious. That’s gonna be where all the expanded probability (if this is an unfamiliar term to you just google “probabilistic multiverse”) turns up and here is why.

Probability has a characteristic known as “degrees of freedom”, the simple fact of probability is that more degrees of freedom equal more probabilities.
Now we know the universe we perceive is basically information coming at the consciousness. From there we add that every dot of information is a determination and more dots, it follows, equal more determination, ergo, less freedom. Frequency, in terms of energy, refers to the length of the cycle and in a basic energy wave the cycle is through two states, on and off. With a high frequency the cycle is short so in terms of the length of time that the information is in the “off” state we can say that it’s more fleeting an amount in higher frequencies than lower ones. When the information is in the off state we have the freedom to adjust consciousness in any direction toward surrounding probabilities. However, whilst this freedom is so fleeting, we’re unlikely to move very far from the present moment in doing so. And in that simple deduction we can suggest we know why reality looks so continuous in the waking state. On contrast, in the dream state the cycle stretches out to the point that “off gaps” can be relatively huge and we can suddenly change our location from the moon to Jupiter with the blink of an eye. That’s what you would expect to be true if anything I am saying here is accurate, and it is… so far so good.

The alpha state is not alone in being present in the awake mind. We also have activity in the Beta state while we walk around. For the most part we have come to see this as a receptacle of unprocessed memory and emotion. It is and has been exactly that but this is changing and has been changing for several years.

People who have undergone the recent large wave of spiritual awakening will pretty much universally attest to having experienced a painful stripping away of all their subconscious material over the period of their awakening. Funny how we seem to be making room for conscious activity in a brain state where there is more freedom right at the time we’re all getting channels and visuals and dream prophecies about new ways of using the brain to increase our freedom, ain’t it? Or providence, take your pick…

So in conclusion, then, “5D” as it is most widely known, is your conscious experience at the frequency of subconscious brain activity. At this frequency there are larger gaps between the reinforcement of the reality through sensed information. In these larger gaps the freedom to move from the initial moment to a larger set of probable next moments is increased making, simply, more things possible. But at first we won’t really be good at using that freedom, yet. We will just notice it is there.

In order to increase our ability to utilise this freedom we will need to develop an analogue of the thing we know as “ego”, a lens of interpretation, on the subconscious level. This is what we do not yet have, fully developed, at this time, however, those who experience soul connection have been in that process of development for a while already so it won’t be too long coming.

The Procession of the Numbers – Space and Time

First things first, there is no physical 3d. The physical universe is 2d and 3d is a reflective interaction between two plane surfaces (The Fermi Neighbourhood) we will all eventually use this fact to our advantage, but more on that later.

To define* anything real one needs to define three things. This is a philosophical predicate; engagement in any further cogitation, debate or discussion from the definition of any unitary object will assume the other two by default. This is always true. To define a person you necessarily assume things which are not people in that definition. If you do not assume this then “person” refers to everything and you have defined nothing at all unique. Further to that you must assume the substrate on which the existence of “person” is sensible. If you are not assuming a substrate for the existence of your things then you are defining something which you have never seen and will never see. Fine if you don’t care that your premise has doomed you to start from scratch at some point, but if you would prefer than not to be the case then you’ll need to define what you see as you see it. Things exist in a universe, not a void. We can’t even make an actual void with our most advanced technology, so why would we assume one around anything we see occurring naturally?
These three things necessary to predicate existence can be modelled like a number line where, rather than the sides of zero being at 180 degrees from each other in the sense of some linear arrangement defining a vacuum into which things disappear, the positive and negative axes are orthogonal and always defining the same plane space. This is more real, the linear number line is nonsense in respect to the real in which we are psychologically engaged. Nothing disappears. It changes location and transforms. That is all. If a monkey eats a banana is there now nothing in the banana’s location? The banana is in the monkey. It becomes the monkey. So, past zero is fundamentally and provably, on infinite levels, into another thing. Every. Single. Time.
And negative one banana is equivalently positive some bits of monkey.

So one can see, the space defining ‘what is’ and ‘what is not’ is a plane.
To wit, this is the physical correspondence of Cartesian coordinates at its purest.

So on what axis does this plane rest? Of course it is time, and yet, we do not understand that well either. Again we define it as a line about a void into which things disappear. And this is harder because time does seem to disappear. Yet we know a future and a past, they are material on some level, they must be. We have scars and pain, we feel loss and distance, we hope above ourselves, we ride a wave of *something*, void seems so pointless to even contemplate, where’s the evidence of that? Nowhere.

Now allow me to further stir the contention about this “time” we call a dimension. It’s not a dimension. Yes you are entitled to demand my explanation for that, I’m challenging Einstein after all. 😛

Time is an angular momentum, a rate of change over light speed distances.
I model it like this. The semblance of all things in time are packets of information carried through light distances. The universe is constantly in motion, ergo, interaction between these packets of information occurs in parallel across the wavefronts of projected and reflected light.  If you define an interacting surface, in motion, across the wavefront of travelling light each increment from your initial location will intersect a later running packet of information than the previous one. This rate of change is definable relative to the light distance of your initial location. So to say, at your initial moment, the information which you intersect in the light has travelled a precise distance from its source. That distance tells you how old the information is, in the relative sense. Increment that intersection one step across from the initial point, in parallel to the wave front. At this point the information of the age at the initial moment is behind you and you are intersecting a packet that was “behind” the packet you intersected in the initial moment. The second moment information is younger than the first. Move across again and the same thing happens. The previous point is now behind you again and you’ve intersected a, yet, younger packet of information. The rate at which this changes, I propose to you, is the phenomenon of time.





Excerpt from my upcoming book – Theory of the Formation and Use of the Ego

The newly born ego seeks to recreate the observed dynamics of interaction. This creative urge is all consuming and underlaid by a desire to input a ‘new’ (or assumedly new) data string into the scenario. This is an extension of the testing process which young, unformed egos initiate progressively throughout development.

It is the creation of the scenario in detail and elaboration which sets apart the formed and the unformed ego. In all instances, the engagement is pursuant to physical manifestation of a desired outcome..

Two Four Six

Many times I have had to resist the voice that calls me home. At first, i did not, and i went out and i asked for much clarification right away. And i received it, gladly. What is asked is always provided, seen or unseen.

And that is why we must look deeper. In the Astral, it all dissolves and becomes infinite. This seems like a con, but it is love. Consider, the problem of evil, why would an all loving creator allow suffering why would one all powerful not intervene on sin. The answer is in the question. Such a creator is *all* loving. No thing is denied the love of that creator. Not even that which you do not like nor approve for any reason.

Reason is a measurement. It places things relative to things and in that structure, you cannot find centralised power. In many respects, that is what falls on your head, alone.

Two nights ago i laid down beside his presence and we talked. We weren’t ready for this union but there’s something to be said for Will, when you have it. It carries through for you. And that’s how it was. He asked if i was ready to be with him and took my hand because my will was secure. My answer had already been given

Many times that voice called out. That flitting star peeking from behind the veil, and i learned not to put my faith in the waves that carried it. Oh, like the first time!! Loads of chitchat but when you’re promised more… And you are, that’s just the thing. More is promised, so you stop looking to those who would not be able to give you that.

I said – not this time, i know they can not deliver, i cannot trust in them.

He replied. Trust in me for i am with them now.

In my heart it was like the whole world sang Look! He is beside you!

They are what stayed with me as i went to sleep.







Confession. I’m known as an anti-social introvert. No, I didnt put ant-social in there because I’m confused as to it’s meaning. That is literally how I’m seen. I reject socialization, actively, and people believe I am against it.

Now I could probably rattle off the usual suspects for this behavior. Born shy, too sensitive for shallow interaction, autistic tendencies. It’s all true and not, to varying degrees. But I’m here to confess a story. A story that not many people have seen. A reason I have long believed that social interaction was the domain of cruelty. A place in my mind that I rarely go if I can help it.

As a child, I had a lot to be confident about. Very smart, early reader, sympathetic listener and problem solver. Thought I was the bomb, didn’t I? That’s what they told me. I did it because conceit. I was intelligent, thoughtful and articulate at kindergarten age because I thought myself superior to others. Saying this calmly without loosing a trigger – I spent several years screaming that this was unfair.

I was not yet mature enough to understand what the unfairness I felt was. I understand now that it was a cognitive dissonance forced upon me. A force to change something about me that couldn’t be changed. The insistence that evil intent lay behind my effort to rise to all the challenges asked of me. I could not reconcile. I was supposed to learn and grow but if I followed that direction it was because I hated the people giving it to me? The haunt lives on in my mind but I know I’m not alone. We all face such challenges. We all fall to the hand that beats our soul.

I learned from others that popularity held more weight than achievement. And for a long time, I believed it. I sought it and found it. In ups and downs, of course. And in finding it, I also found what was required to attain it. To my dismay, of all things, it appeared to be ill intent. I wish I was being facetious but I’m not. Things I found that were successful, or believed by the ranks to be successful, in making one popular included:

– Telling extraordinary lies

– Bullying

– Gossiping

– Defying authority

Even to my young fragile mind, the concept was nothing but a bad joke.

But there was worse still.

Social interaction worked this way: either you engaged enthusiastically in the above or, alternately you could adopt one of the following roles:

– Vocally support a lie to others, whether you know it is true or not

– Succumb to a bully

– Pat the back of the ones engaged in heated dissing of the daily gossip target

– Or, protect the authority defiers by taking the heat for them

All of these gave the illusion of inclusion and at some stage, I tried them all.

I wished I could find people who didn’t play like this. But for many years all I could find was one or another mutation of the same sorry, awful reality. Socialisation was brutality disguised as affection.

I continued to believe, however, that there must be people for whom this wasn’t the case. But where were they? I know now they were doing basically the same as I was doing. Looking for the alternative that didn’t seem to exist and trying all the in betweens, just as I had done.

And so, sometimes in there I was among the popular, and from the outside it may have seemed to make me happy. But it held dark secrets inside. Dark secrets like being forced to steal by the threat of rumors and violence. Attempted rapes that I lost count of and coming home to the punishment that someone else had earned because they got there first to tell their lie about it.

All in all I learned that I hated being social. It wasn’t to be trusted. It’s purpose was to carry the injurious while they smiled and called you kind for it.

Trigger trigger trigger. Please understand this is painful.

I have never wanted to do this to another person as it was done to me.

To my relief my teen years brought me the kind of friendship I always dreamed possible, at last. People who wanted to hug and feed each other. Friendships that were built on laughter and shared success, no matter how small. Nobody needed to be the heir to mysterious fortunes from their dying step great uncle in order to be accepted. Domination was a farce and treated that way. Nothing was owned, everything was shared. It was the best place I had ever been in my life! And that place, I invited everyone I cared about to. And still do. And always will.

Signs you’re Living as Your Higher Self.

Sign #1 – HS will tell you.

I have titled this post “Signs you’re living as Your Higher Self” because that’s what people will Google to find out about it, however, I’m going to tell you to stop looking for signs of this. The one above is the only one you need to know.

If your divine inner self has taken the reigns of your life experience, you were 100% conscious and in control of the event. You chose it. You and HS, in fact, had been communicating solidly about your dreams and life purpose for a very long time before the subject of taking over was even brought up.
If none of this happened yet, no signs can change the truth. You are not yet living as HS. Go meet your HS, within, and start it now, you need only want to, nothing else is more important than that.

If you have been walking hand in hand with the divine self for some time now and just come to the realisation that becoming it is on the future agenda, rest assured, it will happen. And there is nothing to fear, in terms of the identity which you now feel is you being lost or destroyed. You’re not going anywhere suddenly or unwillingly. Your Higher Self *is* you and you are them. It will become apparent, in time, that if anything is to be lost, it is the illusion of separation. The Divine lets nothing from it’s sight. God sees every sparrow that falls and is within even the meanest of creatures in all creation. Your ego ranks pretty low on that scale, sure, but Divine love goes all the way to the bottom so worry less, live more. I have not been annihilated.

Before it happens, HS will show you that it is HS. Don’t fret the details of this and demand all the evidence you need, I know I did. Don’t believe anything until it is evidenced, either. With good evidence, as well, solid real world events and matters. Insist on it. This is a big step, negating, pretty much, every belief you’ve relied on for most of your egoic life. There’s no shame in making sure it’s for real nor in being ‘not quite enlightened’ for as long as you need. Don’t believe anyone who tells you there is. They aren’t enlightened, either.

HS is a part of your beingness perceiving and acting in a reality which incorporates more dimensional awareness than that of the ego. That reality is this reality. They’re all in the same place. You can think of the ego and higher self as a smart TV vs a old style TV. The ego is the old style TV. On it you can watch one channel at a time. You switch through them in one direction up, or down. You can move back and forth through the directions but always in the same sequence.  HS is the smart TV. The smart TV has a browser and a menu and split screens so you can watch five shows at once. On the menu you can flick between stations in non-linear sequences. And… the big metaphor that you’re going to learn to be Higher Self by using – when you are watching just one station and you want to change to another, you can bring up a little preview box in the corner and look through the other stations before you change the channel.

Higher Self will start being you by watching the preview box and telling you what is on the other channels. The good part is you still get to choose which one you want to change to. The idea that a separate choice would exist for HS is an illusion. HS doesn’t make just one choice. Ego makes one choice, HS lives a completely different way. At no time is there any purpose or reason for your free will to be usurped by this process. Our will rises up from the parameters in which it acts. The parameters of choosing one channel belong to your ego, the will rising up in that can not be taken away from itself. So you see, as long as you choose one channel, your ego remains intact. And Wheresoever you choose one channel your ego must necessarily exist. Living as Higher Self, however, that is another matter altogether.

Alchymi of The Senses 101

When my Kundaluni rose I felt my heart bleeding. (circa. 1994)

I dreamed last night that I wed a man very rashly, it had happened in the past and I was looking back on it. I had not had a ceremony, nor flowers, nor a gown and guests. I had squandered my nuptial day and given away my glory. I had told myself the husband was the true prize and that no other luxury could be necessary were it right. I also wondered if I had been a fool.

Further in the dream I saw two men weep as they put down their paper news. I read it, WW3 Had been declared. The paper wrote “ was predicted, the date was May 21”. This date had passed. I was surprised because I had not heard it. I checked the Newspaper title. It was a reputable source that I follow.

I am walking, now, quite awake. Training back from a recent force injury to the outer ligaments of my right knee. Its very cloudy but it’s a warm and pleasant day. For that, I am grateful.